Predictores individuales para la detección y difusión de desinformación sobre COVID-19 a través de WhatsApp

Resumen

Este estudio examina predictores cognitivos, ideológicos y sociodemográficos de la detección e intención de compartir desinformación sobre el COVID-19 vía WhatsApp. Mediante una encuesta en línea, una muestra convencional de 553 adultos costarricenses fue expuestos a contenidos desinformativos sobre vacunas y la respuesta estatal a la pandemia. Los resultados muestran que las personas que apoyan ideologías autoritarias, conservadora y pro-Estado, y personas con bajo pensamiento reflexivo, fueron más proclives a aceptar y compartir desinformación. Además, entre personas con bajo pensamiento reflexivo, aquellas con mayor edad mostraron una mayor detección de desinformación. Finalmente, las personas muy religiosas y conservadores jóvenes con menor nivel educativo, mostraron mayor intención de compartir desinformación.

Biografía del autor

Carlos Brenes Peralta, Universidad de Costa Rica
Education: Licentiate Psychology, University of Costa Rica; Master´s Social Research, VU University Amsterdam (Netherlands); PhD Political Communication, University of Amsterdam Research interests: social psychology of the uses and effects of information and communication technologies, selective exposure and processing of news, public opinion, disinformation and fake news.
Rolando Pérez Sánchez, Universidad de Costa Rica
Education: Licentiate Psychology, University of Costa Rica; PhD Sociology of Communication, University of Frankfurt (Germany) Research interests: social psychology of the uses and effects of information and communication technologies, socio-cognitive and affective processes associated with social media use.
Ignacio Siles, Universidad de Costa Rica
Education: Bachelor´s Communication, University of Costa Rica; Master´s Communication, Université de Montréal (Canada), PhD Media, Technology and Society, Northwestern University (United States) Research interests: communication, technology and society; critical studies of Big Data and algorithms.

Referencias

Altman, D., Luna, J., Piñeiro, R., & Toro, S. (2009). Partidos y sistemas de partidos en
América Latina: Aproximaciones desde la encuesta a expertos 2009. Revista de Ciencia Política, 29(3), 775-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2009000300005
Antonio Guterres [@antonioguterres] (2020, March 27). Example of social media post
[Status update]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/antonioguterres/status/1243748397019992065
Author (2021).
Bago, B., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2020). Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation
reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines. Journal of experimental psychology: general, 149(8), 1608-1613. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000729
Bobbio, N., Matteucci, N., & Pasquino, G. (2004). Il Dizionario di Politica. Torino: UTET.
Brennen, JS., Simon, F., Howard, PN., & Nielsen, RK. (2020). Types, sources, and claims
of COVID-19 misinformation. Reuters Institute. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/types-sources-and-claims-covid-19-misinformation
Bronstein, M. V., Pennycook, G., Bear, A., Rand, D. G., & Cannon, T. D. (2019). Belief
in fake news is associated with delusionality, dogmatism, religious fundamentalism, and reduced analytic thinking. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(1), 108-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.005
Centro de Investigación y Estudios Políticos (CIEP). Informe de resultados del estudio
de opinión sociopolítica de marzo del 2018. https://ciep.ucr.ac.cr/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Informe-de-resultados-del-Estudio-de-Opinio%CC%81n-Sociopoli%CC%81tica-marzo-2018.pdf (accessed 12 August 2021).
Conway, L. G. III, Houck, S. C., Gornick, L. J., & Repke, M. A. (2018). Finding the loch
ness monster: left-wing authoritarianism in the United States. Political Psychology, 39, 1049–1067. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12470
De keersmaecker, J., & Roets, A. (2019). Is there an ideological asymmetry in the moral approval of spreading misinformation by politicians?. Personality and Individual Differences, 143, 165-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.003.
Deppe, K. D., Gonzalez, F. J., Neiman, J., Pahlke, J., Smith, K., & Hibbing, J. R. (2015).
Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives: A look at the Cognitive Reflection Test and ideology. Judgement and Decision Making, 10(4), 314-331. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/poliscifacpub
Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., &
Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 40, 3-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568
Egelhofer, J. L., & Lecheler, S. (2019). Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: a
framework and research agenda. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(2), 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1602782
Fessler, D. M., Pisor, A. C., & Holbrook, C. (2017). Political orientation predicts credulity
regarding putative hazards. Psychological Science, 28(5), 651-660. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617692108
Freelon, D., Marwick, A., & Kreiss, D. (2020). False equivalencies: Online activism from
left to right. Science, 369, 1197–1201. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb2428
Gómez Cruz, E., & Harindranath, R. (2020). WhatsApp as ‘technology of life’: Reframing research agendas. First Monday, 25(12). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i12.10405.
Guess, A., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. (2019). Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors
of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science advances, 5(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4586
Howe, L. D., Hargreaves, J. R., Ploubidis, G. B., De Stavola, B. L., & Huttly, S. R. (2011).
Subjective measures of socio-economic position and the wealth index: a comparative analysis. Health policy and planning, 26(3), 223-232. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czq043
Ireton, C., & Posetti, J. (2018). Journalism, fake news & disinformation: Handbook for journalism education and training. UNESCO Publishing.
Jones-Jang, S. M., Mortensen, T., & Liu, J. (2021). Does media literacy help identification
of fake news? Information literacy helps, but other literacies don’t. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2), 371-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869406
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as
motivated social cognition. Psychological bulletin, 129(3), 339-375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. London: Macmillan.
Latinobarómetro. (2018). Informe 2018. Corporación Latinobarómetro.
https://www.latinobarometro.org/latContents.jsp
McKee, M., & Middleton, J. (2019). Information wars: tackling the threat from
disinformation on vaccines. BMJ. https://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/4653303/1/bmj.l2144.full.pdf
Mosleh, M., Martel, C., Eckles, D., & Rand, D. (2021). Perverse Downstream
Consequences of Debunking: Being Corrected by Another User for Posting False Political News Increases Subsequent Sharing of Low Quality, Partisan, and Toxic Content in a Twitter Field Experiment [Conference]. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Yokohama, Japan.
Operario, D., Adler, N.E., & Williams, D.R. (2004). Subjective social status: reliability and
predictive utility for global health. Psychology and Health, 19, 237–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440310001638098
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake
news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
Pignataro, A., & Cascante, M. (2018). Los electorados de la democracia costarricense.
Percepciones ciudadanas y participación en torno a las elecciones nacional de 2014. San José: IFED-TSE.
Resende, G., Melo, P., Sousa, H., Messias, J., Vasconcelos, M., Almeida, J., & Benevenuto, F. (2019). (Mis)information dissemination in WhatsApp: Gathering, analyzing and countermeasures [Conference]. The World Wide Web Conference, San Francisco, United States.
Rollwage, M., Dolan, R. J., & Fleming, S. M. (2018). Metacognitive failure as a feature of
those holding radical beliefs. Current Biology, 28(24), 4014-4021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.10.053
Roozenbeek, J., Schneider, C. R., Dryhurst, S., Kerr, J., Freeman, A. L., Recchia, G., ... &
Van Der Linden, S. (2020). Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world. Royal Society open science, 7(10), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201199
Sartori, G. (1995). Elementi di teoria politica. Bologna: il Mulino.
Sartori, G. (2005). Partidos y sistemas de partidos. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Shu, K., Wang, S., & Liu, H. (2018, April). Understanding user profiles on social media
for fake news detection [Conference]. 2018 IEEE Conference on Multimedia Information Processing and Retrieval (MIPR), Florida, United States.
Tristán Jiménez, L. & Sibaja Villalobos, I. (2021). Culpables, conjuros, remedios y amenazas: análisis discursivo de las teorías de la conspiración y de la desinformación sobre la COVID-19 en Costa Rica. In I. Siles, L. Tristán-Jiménez, & C. Carazo-Barrantes (Eds.) Verdad en extinción: miradas interdisciplinarias a la desinformación en Costa Rica (pp 227-273). CICOM, University of Costa Rica.
Sinclair, A. H., Stanley, M. L., & Seli, P. (2020). Closed-minded cognition: Right-wing
authoritarianism is negatively related to belief updating following prediction error. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 27(6), 1348-1361. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01767-y
Sindermann, C., Elhaib, J., Moshagen, M., & Montag, Ch. (2020): Age, gender, personality, ideological attitudes and individual differences in a person’s news spectrum: How many and who might be prone to “filter bubbles” and “echo chambers” online? Heliyon, 6(1), e03214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03214
Tagliabue, F., Galassi, L., & Mariani, P. (2020). The “pandemic” of disinformation in COVID-19. SN comprehensive clinical medicine, 2(9), 1287-1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00439-1
Tandoc Jr, Edson C. (2021). Fake news. In H. Tumber, & S. Waisbord (Eds.), The Routledge companion to media misinformation and populism (pp. 110–117). Routledge.
Tardáguila, C. (2019). Falsehoods Outperform Facts in Brazilian WhatsApp Groups, Study Shows. Poynter.org. https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2019/falsehoods-outperform-facts-in-brazilian-whatsapp-groups-study-shows/
Thomson, K. S., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2016). Investigating an alternate form of the
cognitive reflection test. Judgment and Decision making, 11(1), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1037/t49856-000
Valenzuela, S., Bachmann, I., & Bargsted, M. (2021). The personal is the political? What do Whatsapp users share and how it matters for news knowledge, polarization and participation in Chile. Digital Journalism, 9(2), 155-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1693904
Van Bavel, J. J., & Pereira, A. (2018). The partisan brain: An identity-based model of
political belief. Trends in cognitive sciences, 22(3), 213-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.004
Van Deursen, A. J., Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2016). Development and validation of the
Internet Skills Scale (ISS). Information, Communication & Society, 19(6), 804-823. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1078834
Van Deursen, A. J., & Van Dijk, J. A. (2009). Using the Internet: Skill related problems in
users’ online behavior. Interacting with computers, 21(5-6), 393-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2009.06.005
Van Deursen, A. J., & Van Dijk, J. A. (2014). Digital skills: Unlocking the information
society. New York: Springer.
Wagner, C., & Boczkowski, P. J. (2019). The reception of fake news: The interpretations and practices that shape the consumption of perceived misinformation. Digital Journalism, 7(7), 870–885. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1653208
Wenzel, A. (2019). To Verify or to Disengage: Coping with ‘Fake News’ and Ambiguity. International Journal of Communication, 13, 1977–1995. Available at http://ijoc.org.
Publicado
2024-01-31
Cómo citar
Brenes Peralta, C., Pérez Sánchez, R., & Siles, I. (2024). Predictores individuales para la detección y difusión de desinformación sobre COVID-19 a través de WhatsApp. Apuntes. Revista De Ciencias Sociales, 51(96). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21678/apuntes.96.1985
Sección
Artículos